Start writing a post

Bruce Castor's testimony during Trump's impeachment contradicted the very reason he was hired

Unfortunately, I could tell the defense team was put together in a small-time frame because of some of the things that were being said, particularly by Bruce Castor.

Bruce Castor's testimony during Trump's impeachment contradicted the very reason he was hired

Attorney Bruce Castor, representing and defending former President Donald Trump, holds a copy of the U.S. Constitution as he addresses the U.S. Senate as the start of the second impeachment trial of former president, on charges of inciting the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol, on the floor of the Senate chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., February 9, 2021.

U.S. Senate TV/Handout via Reuters

Interesting things in politics tend to happen on a Tuesday, hence the second impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump.

As we heard gut-wrenching testimony from Rep. Jamie Raskin's (D-MD) heartbreaking account of his son's death, we were also met with testimony from members of Trump's Defense team ( Bruce Castor, David Schoen, Michael van der Veen), which was literally put together a little over a week ago.


Unfortunately, I could tell the defense team was put together in a small-time frame because of some of the things that were being said, particularly by Bruce Castor.

In a Twitter video clip from NBC, Castor said this about American's and the choices they made about the administration: "The American people just spoke…They're smart enough to pick a new administration if they don't like the old one-and they just did."

Although American citizens "just spoke" out about wanting a change from the horrendous actions that occurred throughout the Trump administration and "just changed" administrations ( thank goodness for President Joe Biden), it seems as if Castor is completely missing the point as to why the impeachment trial is happening.

Citizens vouched for the change they wanted to see and triumphed, but it came at the opposition of staunch Trump supporters who believed in one of the biggest, baseless claims from Trump regarding the 2020 election—voter fraud.

Through some people believing that there were discrepancies with votes, and listening to and agreeing with Trump's rhetoric as he said things such as "fight like hell", he inadvertently incited the atrocities at Capitol Hill, even if he doesn't believe that he did.

Twitter also wasn't impressed Castor had to say either. Here's what was said:



All in all, Castor, along with the other members of Trump's legal team, represents and supports him. However, it would be in their best interest to ask their client if he changed his tune or not. Better yet, if they haven't already, they should watch or read the news so that they are always aware of what's happening. It would make the situation less of a hot mess.

Have you got something to say? Want to see your writing here? Submit a post to Conversations today.

Why as a mum and a psychologist I want us to talk more about dads

I am psychologist at the University of Sussex whose work is focused on supporting and researching parents - it has become clear to me that we need to worker harder to support the mental health of fathers. Here's why.

Why as a mum and a psychologist I want us to talk more about dads

Fatherhood

Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

I am stood in the kitchen experiencing a jangling combination of exhilaration, because my infant daughter has gone to sleep, and dread, because in just four hours she will wake up again.


Keep reading... Show less

Children have a place on the frontlines of the culture wars

What Should We Do When the Culture Wars Invade Our Children’s Lives?

Children have a place on the frontlines of the culture wars

You know when there’s a controversy whether to include both sides to the Holocaust in a Texas school district, the culture wars have once again invaded the children’s lives. Similarly, in Southern Pennsylvania, books by people of color were banned (or per the official Central York School statement: “frozen” for an entire year.)

These discussions by the school boards are impacted by the bills passed in government, as in the case of House Bill 3979 requiring public school teachers to present various points of view when teaching about current events and social issues. Often, the impulse to clutch pearls and to “think of the children” is a rhetorical device to further political causes. As the larger climate in a racialized society such as the United States grapple with a history of slavery and the fight for racial justice--with the most current iteration being the black lives matter protests in the summer of 2020--what the children learn in schools have become a new battleground for those who land on opposing sides of this culture war.

Keep reading... Show less
#StartTheConversation by joining us on
x

Join our new platform for free and your post can reach a huge audience on Indy100 and The Independent join