Start writing a post

'Hamilton' is MORE than Jonathan Groff's spit

Hamilton Richard Rodgers signage

Hamilton, the 2016 Tony Award winning musical everyone has been clamoring over recently reignited its passionate fans, and gained new ones. Our clamoring continued when the Disney+ released the musical on the eve of the most cringe worthy 4th of July ever.

Here is a brilliant piece of theater portraying America's founding fathers, but they do not look like the founding fathers in our subpar history books. Daveed Diggs, a phenomenal Black actor, portrays Thomas Jefferson, the man who wrote that "all men are created equal" while owning enslaved people, some of whom were his relatives. The hypocrisy of the founding fathers is dumbfounding. Check it out. Aaron Burr is Hamilton's white rival who killed him, played by Tony Award winning Black actor Leslie Odom Jr. The brilliant Lin Manuel-Miranda (who wrote "In the Heights" first - listen to it!) is of Puerto Rican descent, playing the titular character of Hamilton, a Puerto Rican immigrant - that tracks. I could go through the entire cast and compare their ethnicity to that of their characters, but I'll stop. But know that the very intentional casting choices should be noted and not ignored. So why are we not using Hamilton as a launch pad for critical discussions about racial justice? Oh, that's right. We're too busy obsessing over Jonathan Groff's spit.

Do not misconstrue my point and make this a critique on Groff. It's not. His rendition of "You'll Be Back" on the streaming platform far outshines his performance on the recording. This is instead a critique of the media consumers who act like a mosquito that won't leave your ankle alone. Move on to ANY other part of the body, mosquito!

By focusing on his spitting (which just happens to actors! Watch Matt LeBlanc and Gary Oldman in "TOW Monica and Chandler's Wedding"), there are critical points about the musical that are being missed. Renee Elise Goldsberry's (Angelica's) impeccable placement in her riffs, Phillipa Soo's (Eliza's) heart-wrenching acting choices in "Burn", and Diggs' insanely fast rapped solos in "Guns and Ships" when he's playing everyone's favorite fighting Frenchmen. Let's make those accolades trending. These performers are unbelievably talented and have spent their 10,000 hours and then some to be on Broadway in the most popular musical of our generation. They don't deserve to be overshadowed by spit.

If you want to focus on tiny details, at least focus on details that mean something. Hamilton married into the wealthy Schuyler family-a family with a history of owning enslaved people, and who continued to do so during Hamilton's lifetime. We cannot only serve up Alexander Hamilton as a hero. Our founding fathers should not be viewed as good or bad. They should be viewed as people. Super hypocritical people, but people nonetheless. And people make mistakes and poor choices. The terrible institution of slavery that still besmirches our nation's made up honor is really only spoken about in the show by John Laurens, Hamilton's friend who's dream was to create a Black battalion to fight for the revolution. Hamilton supports this plan, until Laurens tragically dies at the end of the war. The letter from his father says that his dream of equality for Black people died with him. So even if the musical didn't go more into slavery, why are we not talking about THAT? The omission of slavery? What does that mean for the musical? Talk about something of importance, ANYTHING of importance.

By making Groff's spit a focal point, we are once again falling into the dangerous pattern that continues to persist in our country- the pattern of the well-meaning white liberal. In his "Letter from the Birmingham Jail" written on April 16th, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. warns of the harm done by well-meaning white liberals. They act supportive, they act like they are listening, yet when it comes time to take action and fight for equity and equality, they remain silent. When we speak of spit, we are silent to all of the other salient points that Hamilton expresses.

I'll leave you with this parting thought. The next time you find yourself on Disney + hankering for a reprise, remember: spit does not matter. Black lives matter. They always have, and they always will.

Note: Looking for behind the scenes content? Watch this SirusXM Radio interview with Mr. Miranda and most of the principal cast (not Groff, we love ya Buddy, but King George is the silly villain, not the focal point). It's such a fun interview that's worth your time!

Women founders continue to come up against common challenges and biases

Written by Kelly Devine, Division President UK & Ireland, Mastercard

Starting a business may have historically been perceived as a man’s game, but this couldn’t be further from reality. Research shows women are actually more likely than men to actively choose to start their own business – often motivated by the desire to be their own boss or to have a better work-life balance and spend more time with their family.

The recently published Mastercard Index of Women Entrepreneurship 2021 found that in the category of 'Aspiration Driven Entrepreneurship’ – capturing those who actively choose to start their own business – women in the UK surpass men: 60% vs 56%. And Mastercard research from February 2022 found 10% of female business owners started their business in the past two years compared to 6% of men – meaning women were 67% more likely to have started a business during the pandemic.

Yet, there are common challenges that women founders continue to come up against - not least the gender imbalance in the household and long-held biases which are still prevalent.

In the UK, women are almost three times more likely to be balancing care and home commitments than men, and this was exacerbated during the pandemic as the additional barriers of school closures and lockdowns meant that the care time of dependents rose significantly on a day-to-day level for women. In addition, women were less likely to have access to a home office, greatly impacting the work they were able to accomplish when working from home was the only option.

It's also widely known that female business owners are still more likely to struggle to access funding for their business ideas. According to Dealroom, all-women founding teams received just 1.4% of the €23.7bn invested into UK start-ups in 2021, while all-male leadership teams have taken almost 90% of the available capital.

Without financial support, and when juggling significant time pressures both at home and at work, how can women grow their companies and #BreaktheBias (as this year’s International Women’s Day termed it)? What tools or support can save them time and money, and give them the headspace they need to focus on building their business?

With female owned businesses collectively estimating revenue growth of £120 billion over the next five years, solving this problem is bigger than supporting women – it’s about supporting the national economy.

Using tech to level the playing field

There are clearly societal issues at play that need to be resolved. But when we look at the rise in technology businesses during the pandemic, we can plainly see an alternative source of support critical for business growth: digital tools.

A third of female business owners say new technologies will be crucial to the success of their business in the future and one in five say it is the most important thing for business growth.

With new technology comes new ways to pay, create, and work. And yet there are barriers that prevent business owners accessing this technology. Women are significantly more likely to say they want to use more digital tools but don’t know what is best for their business and also more concerned about the security of digital tools.

When technology is adopted by businesses – whether using online accounting solutions or messenger services for communicating with staff – it saves them time, allows them to maintain and grow their customer base, and ultimately increases cost savings and profit.

By drastically improving the training and support that is available to women-owned business to access and utilise technology we will allow these businesses to grow and succeed. And we know there is demand for it.

Research done by the IFC and Dalberg shows that female entrepreneurs are more likely to invest time and money in business development. This includes product development, customer base expansion, and digital tools and training and there are plenty of services available offering this type of support – many of them for free.

One such programme is Strive UK – an initiative of the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth – which aims to reach 650,000 micro and small business owners across the UK and empower them with the tools they need to thrive in the digital economy through free guidance, helpful tools and one-to-one mentoring.

Working together with small business experts – Enterprise Nation, Be the Business and Digital Boost – we hope to ensure hundreds of thousands of UK female business owners have the tools they need to succeed and reach their ambitious goals. Because this ambition remains strong in the UK, with female business owners largely optimistic about the future despite the multitude of challenges they are facing. Four in ten say they will grow their business in the next five years – compared to only a third of male business owners – and they’re also 35% less likely than men to say they plan to downsize or close the business.

But if we do not empower female entrepreneurs to access the tools and technology they need to grow, there is a risk this optimism could be misplaced. Support programmes that provide business owners with guidance and mentorship can help ensure this isn’t the case, allowing female entrepreneurs to not only survive but thrive in the months and years ahead.