Start writing a post

As a human rights activist, I began to realize that the U.S. is based on systemic racism

brown game pieces on white surface

This year has brought so much suffering for many people - both in terms of health and personal finances. However, the portion of the population living off retirement income and/or is invested in the stock market is seeing their financial situation improved. It seems very strange and unfair.

Even though I lived in the U.S. for almost four decades, I have never really thought about systemic racism until this year, when it became a hot topic. I came here from Finland, a Nordic welfare state, which for the most part works in an egalitarian fashion, regardless of race, and historically there were very few people of color in the country.

I was aware of biases and discrimination against our own indigenous communities (Sami) and the Roma. But Blacks were almost nonexistent at the time in my country. In addition, as a human rights activist since my days as a student, I always considered that racism wasn't relevant to me personally.

When I arrived in the U.S. as a white, professionally educated immigrant, married to a U.S. citizen, I was immediately in a more privileged position than most other immigrants. I realized this very quickly. What didn't dawn on me until much later, is how just by setting foot in the U.S., now I became part of "white privilege" and a beneficiary of systemic racism. Although my husband and I both came from a middle-class background, we benefited from the way the capitalist system works.

Many white people in the U.S., will recognize this pattern. Your ancestors came here from Europe centuries ago, and were given a piece of land - taken from the indigenous - to cultivate. In the south, their slaves worked the land and the owners prospered.

READ: An open letter to the U.S. Capitol rioters

An open letter to the U.S. Capitol riotersconversations.indy100.com

When I heard Mr. Trump say on TV to his followers, "I love you," "you are special," I thought that might have been why you and so many others like you support him.

The whites educated their children. The slaves were not allowed to. The "40 acres and a mule" decree after emancipation was quickly reversed. In the north, farmers also cultivated their land, and as they became wealthier, some sold the land and invested in emerging manufacturing. Some were able to extract resources from the land they owned, such as oil. Freed slaves and new immigrants worked in the factories for a pittance and lived hand to mouth.

They never had enough to put any money aside.

All over the world, and throughout history, the question of land ownership has been at the heart of systems of oppression and the revolutions that follow; and its resolution has led to the narrowing of class differences and more societal stability. In the U.S., it seems to me this is still unresolved.

Wealth was passed down to the next generation, and more whites than Blacks had an increasingly better starting point in life when it came to education and a nest egg for building a family. Of course, many people of different backgrounds have been successful (the American Dream), including some of those of slave ancestry or those arriving on these shores dirt-poor from any part of the world.

They achieved wealth through innate ability (think successful Black musicians and athletes) and/or hard work, often selling goods and services to the wealthy whites, especially if they started their own businesses. But their starting point is later and their numbers smaller so that the wealth disparities continue to increase as the stock market yields its returns.

Today, according to the Social Security Administration, 93% of whites have financial assets apart from housing, compared to 62% of Blacks and 54% of Hispanics. The same pattern is seen in all categories of wealth (housing, non-housing equity, tangible assets, pensions and social security), and the dollar amounts are also less in the latter groups. You may have heard the humorous twist on the old saying "he made his money the old fashioned way….he inherited it". So true.

So while so many whites are born with a "silver spoon in their mouth", Black and Brown children start out already disadvantaged and have a more difficult time catching up. I also finally understood the difference between the words "equality" and "equity" by this great cartoon.

Illustrating equality vs. equityInteraction Institute for Social Change | Artist: Angus Maguire

Now I also understand what is meant by "reparations". If you're like me, you don't feel guilty about the plight of Black and Brown populations because you personally are "not racist and treat everybody with equal respect". But because the system—going back to the colonization of America—is racist, you have benefited financially, and are continuing to. Therefore, justice demands that you begin to pay back. Many others have said this better. Check out this great infographic and explanation here.

How can this be done? Here are a few ways:

  1. Most effectively through societal wealth distribution through taxation. Yes, taxation is the hallmark of civilized society – when applied progressively and the proceeds distributed fairly.
  2. Through free education. This has been the way for minorities as well as poor whites to advance, but quality education still requires wealth. By financing public schools through local taxes, the cycle repeats itself – wealthy districts have better schools. A more equitable way of financing education from pre-K up through college needs to be found.
  3. As so much wealth is in private hands, wealthy individuals can – in addition to charitable donations to organizations supporting BIPOC people - accomplish a lot by favoring investments in BIPOC owned businesses. Add to that women-owned and ESG companies, and you will set us all on a path to a better future.
  4. By electing leaders who understand all of the above, we can begin to level the playing field for all citizens, although easier said than done. Today we suffer from an unprecedented amount of media disinformation circulating to people who are in no position to evaluate it critically, due to lack of education. For a young person to become a teacher, journalist or run for office is probably the most laudable career I can think of.
Dr.Jaana Rehnström is the Founder and President of the Kota Alliance, an organization elevating collaboration across borders for women-centered nonprofits, NGOs, and much more. View her work here.
Women founders continue to come up against common challenges and biases

Written by Kelly Devine, Division President UK & Ireland, Mastercard

Starting a business may have historically been perceived as a man’s game, but this couldn’t be further from reality. Research shows women are actually more likely than men to actively choose to start their own business – often motivated by the desire to be their own boss or to have a better work-life balance and spend more time with their family.

The recently published Mastercard Index of Women Entrepreneurship 2021 found that in the category of 'Aspiration Driven Entrepreneurship’ – capturing those who actively choose to start their own business – women in the UK surpass men: 60% vs 56%. And Mastercard research from February 2022 found 10% of female business owners started their business in the past two years compared to 6% of men – meaning women were 67% more likely to have started a business during the pandemic.

Yet, there are common challenges that women founders continue to come up against - not least the gender imbalance in the household and long-held biases which are still prevalent.

In the UK, women are almost three times more likely to be balancing care and home commitments than men, and this was exacerbated during the pandemic as the additional barriers of school closures and lockdowns meant that the care time of dependents rose significantly on a day-to-day level for women. In addition, women were less likely to have access to a home office, greatly impacting the work they were able to accomplish when working from home was the only option.

It's also widely known that female business owners are still more likely to struggle to access funding for their business ideas. According to Dealroom, all-women founding teams received just 1.4% of the €23.7bn invested into UK start-ups in 2021, while all-male leadership teams have taken almost 90% of the available capital.

Without financial support, and when juggling significant time pressures both at home and at work, how can women grow their companies and #BreaktheBias (as this year’s International Women’s Day termed it)? What tools or support can save them time and money, and give them the headspace they need to focus on building their business?

With female owned businesses collectively estimating revenue growth of £120 billion over the next five years, solving this problem is bigger than supporting women – it’s about supporting the national economy.

Using tech to level the playing field

There are clearly societal issues at play that need to be resolved. But when we look at the rise in technology businesses during the pandemic, we can plainly see an alternative source of support critical for business growth: digital tools.

A third of female business owners say new technologies will be crucial to the success of their business in the future and one in five say it is the most important thing for business growth.

With new technology comes new ways to pay, create, and work. And yet there are barriers that prevent business owners accessing this technology. Women are significantly more likely to say they want to use more digital tools but don’t know what is best for their business and also more concerned about the security of digital tools.

When technology is adopted by businesses – whether using online accounting solutions or messenger services for communicating with staff – it saves them time, allows them to maintain and grow their customer base, and ultimately increases cost savings and profit.

By drastically improving the training and support that is available to women-owned business to access and utilise technology we will allow these businesses to grow and succeed. And we know there is demand for it.

Research done by the IFC and Dalberg shows that female entrepreneurs are more likely to invest time and money in business development. This includes product development, customer base expansion, and digital tools and training and there are plenty of services available offering this type of support – many of them for free.

One such programme is Strive UK – an initiative of the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth – which aims to reach 650,000 micro and small business owners across the UK and empower them with the tools they need to thrive in the digital economy through free guidance, helpful tools and one-to-one mentoring.

Working together with small business experts – Enterprise Nation, Be the Business and Digital Boost – we hope to ensure hundreds of thousands of UK female business owners have the tools they need to succeed and reach their ambitious goals. Because this ambition remains strong in the UK, with female business owners largely optimistic about the future despite the multitude of challenges they are facing. Four in ten say they will grow their business in the next five years – compared to only a third of male business owners – and they’re also 35% less likely than men to say they plan to downsize or close the business.

But if we do not empower female entrepreneurs to access the tools and technology they need to grow, there is a risk this optimism could be misplaced. Support programmes that provide business owners with guidance and mentorship can help ensure this isn’t the case, allowing female entrepreneurs to not only survive but thrive in the months and years ahead.