Start writing a post

The controversial things about Dr. Seuss that took me by surprise

A plush 'Cat in the Hat' toy is displayed next to 'What Pet Should I Get?,' the latest book by Dr. Seuss, on Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at a bookstore in Concord, N.H. The book, released 24 years after the authorís death, includes the same pair of siblings featured in Seussís 1960 classic 'One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish.'
AP Photo/Holly Ramer

Theodor "Dr. Seuss" Geisel is a prolific author, whose work has become a literary staple in children's literature. He illustrated during the early and mid-half of the last century, and was known to be progressive and anti-racist. Despite this, he has been accused of underlying racism in the artwork for a few years now.

National educators have been advocating to "cancel" the author in the name of change for this reason. March 2 is not only his birthday, but Read Across America Day. That has significantly altered.

Since 1998, the National Education Society exclusively showcased and highlighted Dr.Seuss' work. But in 2017, the organization shifted the focus to "Celebrating a Nation of Diverse Readers," which focuses on diverse American perspectives.

With that, here are some of the findings that are underlyingly racist within Dr.Seuss' literary career that surprised me.

The creation of a minstrel show

Unfortunately, you read that correctly.

Dr.Seuss wrote a minstrel show called "Chicopee Surprised" as a fundraiser for a school trip and performed it wearing Blackface.

The advertisements he created for bug spray company had racist

While creating advertisements with Flit, a DDT-laced bug spray company that was a subsidiary of the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, racist images were portrayed of Black and Middle Eastern people. One ad appeared to portray an "African" wearing nothing but a skirt, which is quite offensive for obvious reasons, but I digress.

Certain books will not be published anymore due to racially insensitive imagery

According to the Associated Press, six Dr. Seuss books will not be published anymore, such as "And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street", "If I Ran the Zoo", McElligot's Pool," "On Beyond Zebra!," "Scrambled Eggs Super!," and "The Cat's Quizzer."

Some experts even claim parts of Dr. Seuss' work that had underlying racism in it as well were The Cat in the Hat and Green Eggs and Ham, which I read and adored as a child growing up. Although not explicitly racist, The Cat and the Hatcould be viewed as Blackface even if that wasn't the intention.

These books portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong," said Dr. Seuss Enterprises to AP, saying: "These books portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong." coincided with the late author and illustrator's birthday.

READ: The tweet that made me think of the realities of racial insensitivity in the guise of jokes

The tweet that made me think of the realities of racial insensitivity in the guise of jokesconversations.indy100.com

It's not really a secret that racial insensitivity in the guise of a joke, whether the person knows it's insensitive or not, is quite common.

Moreover, in a study by researchers Katie Ishizuka and Ramon Stephens, they discovered that only 2% of the human characters portrayed in the Seuss' books were people of color. Forty-three characters were identified as having characteristics suggesting Orientalism. Only two characters are identified as "African," which aligns with the anti-Blackness.

They also reported the males of color tended to be portrayed as caricatures, through dehumanizing and exotified roles compared to the white characters. An example was a Chinese man drawn with chopsticks and a bowl of rice in his hand, with slanted eyes and yellow skin. Also, men in turbans with curled-toed slippers were noticed in A Little Bug Went Ka-choo; If I Ran The Zoo; And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street; Did I Ever Tell You How Lucky You Are?; On Beyond Zebra.

Overall, despite Dr. Seuss' literature being ingrained into many people, especially children emerging into their literature prowess, there is still plenty to be done when it comes to encouraging civil rights and standing up for those discriminated against.

Have you got something to say about this subject? Submit a post here and start the conversation.




Women founders continue to come up against common challenges and biases

Written by Kelly Devine, Division President UK & Ireland, Mastercard

Starting a business may have historically been perceived as a man’s game, but this couldn’t be further from reality. Research shows women are actually more likely than men to actively choose to start their own business – often motivated by the desire to be their own boss or to have a better work-life balance and spend more time with their family.

The recently published Mastercard Index of Women Entrepreneurship 2021 found that in the category of 'Aspiration Driven Entrepreneurship’ – capturing those who actively choose to start their own business – women in the UK surpass men: 60% vs 56%. And Mastercard research from February 2022 found 10% of female business owners started their business in the past two years compared to 6% of men – meaning women were 67% more likely to have started a business during the pandemic.

Yet, there are common challenges that women founders continue to come up against - not least the gender imbalance in the household and long-held biases which are still prevalent.

In the UK, women are almost three times more likely to be balancing care and home commitments than men, and this was exacerbated during the pandemic as the additional barriers of school closures and lockdowns meant that the care time of dependents rose significantly on a day-to-day level for women. In addition, women were less likely to have access to a home office, greatly impacting the work they were able to accomplish when working from home was the only option.

It's also widely known that female business owners are still more likely to struggle to access funding for their business ideas. According to Dealroom, all-women founding teams received just 1.4% of the €23.7bn invested into UK start-ups in 2021, while all-male leadership teams have taken almost 90% of the available capital.

Without financial support, and when juggling significant time pressures both at home and at work, how can women grow their companies and #BreaktheBias (as this year’s International Women’s Day termed it)? What tools or support can save them time and money, and give them the headspace they need to focus on building their business?

With female owned businesses collectively estimating revenue growth of £120 billion over the next five years, solving this problem is bigger than supporting women – it’s about supporting the national economy.

Using tech to level the playing field

There are clearly societal issues at play that need to be resolved. But when we look at the rise in technology businesses during the pandemic, we can plainly see an alternative source of support critical for business growth: digital tools.

A third of female business owners say new technologies will be crucial to the success of their business in the future and one in five say it is the most important thing for business growth.

With new technology comes new ways to pay, create, and work. And yet there are barriers that prevent business owners accessing this technology. Women are significantly more likely to say they want to use more digital tools but don’t know what is best for their business and also more concerned about the security of digital tools.

When technology is adopted by businesses – whether using online accounting solutions or messenger services for communicating with staff – it saves them time, allows them to maintain and grow their customer base, and ultimately increases cost savings and profit.

By drastically improving the training and support that is available to women-owned business to access and utilise technology we will allow these businesses to grow and succeed. And we know there is demand for it.

Research done by the IFC and Dalberg shows that female entrepreneurs are more likely to invest time and money in business development. This includes product development, customer base expansion, and digital tools and training and there are plenty of services available offering this type of support – many of them for free.

One such programme is Strive UK – an initiative of the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth – which aims to reach 650,000 micro and small business owners across the UK and empower them with the tools they need to thrive in the digital economy through free guidance, helpful tools and one-to-one mentoring.

Working together with small business experts – Enterprise Nation, Be the Business and Digital Boost – we hope to ensure hundreds of thousands of UK female business owners have the tools they need to succeed and reach their ambitious goals. Because this ambition remains strong in the UK, with female business owners largely optimistic about the future despite the multitude of challenges they are facing. Four in ten say they will grow their business in the next five years – compared to only a third of male business owners – and they’re also 35% less likely than men to say they plan to downsize or close the business.

But if we do not empower female entrepreneurs to access the tools and technology they need to grow, there is a risk this optimism could be misplaced. Support programmes that provide business owners with guidance and mentorship can help ensure this isn’t the case, allowing female entrepreneurs to not only survive but thrive in the months and years ahead.